Mobbing a tempo indeterminato -- Mobbing Indefinitely
The artwork aims to highlight and denounce, through paraphrase artistic aesthetic and a different register, that manifests the human condition that affects several individuals as part of its path in social, occupational and professional: MOBBING. In the Installation is observed, in all of its three-dimensional evidence, a clock without watch hands, deprived of its specific and essential function: mark the hours and mark the temporal aspect. We will have in this case..... a mobbing indefinitely.
Mobbing is, without doubt, one of the most shameful aspects of our society, and appears as a condition practiced and stratified always, albeit in different forms and ways, precisely because of its adherence to a sneaky attitude, carved into the deep interior of the characteristics mankind, which tends to deprive content psychological those individuals considered "enemies to be destroyed."
It is unfortunately a practice that tends to pass concealed, minimized, never overt, never declared, apparently absent, non-obvious. Those exercising the mobbing, if they were forced to verbally express justification, would call just a mistake unconsciously, a casual carelessness, a slight and involuntary inexperience, despite this attitude has been constantly and maliciously repeated as planned. The method used to carry this punishment results in an urgent process of constant relocation, repositioning incessant, a demotion obsessive, a surgical cancellation psychological, because these sympathizers and fanatics zeroing when not intended to deal fairly "the adversary" placing itself on an equal area of confrontation, seek tripped conscious exploit that little margin of hierarchical power to get a win culpable. The perpetrators of these destructive behavioral devices, are the kapos post-industrial, insolent and useless as mosquitoes, but through their actions are devastating the lives of others without qualms but with complete, precise and intentional evil individual.
Those who practice mobbing choose the "container" and not the "content". For them, the acceptance of the ideas and behavior is directly proportional to the express sympathy to those who made the proposal. Rather, at his side, people faithful rather than virtuous, thinking, or even immune to the syndrome of appeasement genetic-genital. For these zealous practitioners of harassment, ethics is a scuffle with the surrogate aesthetic, with empathy, friendship interested, or subjection.
There is, however, in the entirety of the matter, a good thing for those who suffer the act of oppression, and you can identify with what we could call the failure to "participation in the event." Obviously you do not want to be a trivial expedient balancing psychological nor an absorber for somatization not certain attitudes, but wants to provide an appreciable distance parameter ethics to these shameful human behaviors. If, in fact, the phrase "like attracts like", it remains an established and true staple of popular oral tradition, then who is subjected to these abuses must be considered happy not determine any attraction and sympathy for these individuals. It may see only an irrelevant philosophical substitute that is used to avoid the personal involvement of the individual, or soothe the discomfort of this attention, but actually says the manifest and complete innocence against anomalous macroscopic and attitudes of absolute social disorder and ignoble behavioural presence.
Mobbing is, without doubt, one of the most shameful aspects of our society, and appears as a condition practiced and stratified always, albeit in different forms and ways, precisely because of its adherence to a sneaky attitude, carved into the deep interior of the characteristics mankind, which tends to deprive content psychological those individuals considered "enemies to be destroyed."
It is unfortunately a practice that tends to pass concealed, minimized, never overt, never declared, apparently absent, non-obvious. Those exercising the mobbing, if they were forced to verbally express justification, would call just a mistake unconsciously, a casual carelessness, a slight and involuntary inexperience, despite this attitude has been constantly and maliciously repeated as planned. The method used to carry this punishment results in an urgent process of constant relocation, repositioning incessant, a demotion obsessive, a surgical cancellation psychological, because these sympathizers and fanatics zeroing when not intended to deal fairly "the adversary" placing itself on an equal area of confrontation, seek tripped conscious exploit that little margin of hierarchical power to get a win culpable. The perpetrators of these destructive behavioral devices, are the kapos post-industrial, insolent and useless as mosquitoes, but through their actions are devastating the lives of others without qualms but with complete, precise and intentional evil individual.
Those who practice mobbing choose the "container" and not the "content". For them, the acceptance of the ideas and behavior is directly proportional to the express sympathy to those who made the proposal. Rather, at his side, people faithful rather than virtuous, thinking, or even immune to the syndrome of appeasement genetic-genital. For these zealous practitioners of harassment, ethics is a scuffle with the surrogate aesthetic, with empathy, friendship interested, or subjection.
There is, however, in the entirety of the matter, a good thing for those who suffer the act of oppression, and you can identify with what we could call the failure to "participation in the event." Obviously you do not want to be a trivial expedient balancing psychological nor an absorber for somatization not certain attitudes, but wants to provide an appreciable distance parameter ethics to these shameful human behaviors. If, in fact, the phrase "like attracts like", it remains an established and true staple of popular oral tradition, then who is subjected to these abuses must be considered happy not determine any attraction and sympathy for these individuals. It may see only an irrelevant philosophical substitute that is used to avoid the personal involvement of the individual, or soothe the discomfort of this attention, but actually says the manifest and complete innocence against anomalous macroscopic and attitudes of absolute social disorder and ignoble behavioural presence.
Comments 2
Say something