![Between Two Worlds Between Two Worlds](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/1/7/2017-103682-83340_21720_41265_t.jpg?m=1498152664)
Between Two Worlds
![Between Two Worlds Between Two Worlds](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/1/7/2017-103682-83340_21720_4565_t.jpg?m=1498152664)
The images are based on studies of cognitive and visual perception in that they exploit limitations of visual perception and become a metaphor for social dynamics. If presented with two or more competing realities, our brains visual perception reacts in two ways. As in the Necker Cube Illusion, the brain will switch between possible realities, or will synthesise the realities into a plausible unreality. Cognitively, if we accept the premise that it is impossible to neither prove nor disprove the existence of God and we are solely reliant on evidence to draw conclusions, it is possible to say as an ideal, that there is no possibility of proof and that at best proof consists only as an internal consistency which when applied will result in a higher level of predictability. As we have seen with the development of politics in recent times, when politicians put their self interest before the welfare of the country, the competing realities in an adversarial democratic system, the resultant public policy takes on a Kafkaesque absurdity.
![Decay and the Quest for Immortality Decay and the Quest for Immortality](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/4/5/2017-103682-83341_4455_41265_t.jpg?m=1498152754)
Decay and the Quest for Immortality
![Decay and the Quest for Immortality Decay and the Quest for Immortality](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/4/5/2017-103682-83341_4455_4565_t.jpg?m=1498152754)
The images are based on studies of cognitive and visual perception in that they exploit limitations of visual perception and become a metaphor for social dynamics. If presented with two or more competing realities, our brains visual perception reacts in two ways. As in the Necker Cube Illusion, the brain will switch between possible realities, or will synthesise the realities into a plausible unreality. Cognitively, if we accept the premise that it is impossible to neither prove nor disprove the existence of God and we are solely reliant on evidence to draw conclusions, it is possible to say as an ideal, that there is no possibility of proof and that at best proof consists only as an internal consistency which when applied will result in a higher level of predictability. As we have seen with the development of politics in recent times, when politicians put their self interest before the welfare of the country, the competing realities in an adversarial democratic system, the resultant public policy takes on a Kafkaesque absurdity.
![I Can See Trouble Ahead I Can See Trouble Ahead](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/4/1/2017-103682-83342_14131_41265_t.jpg?m=1498152832)
I Can See Trouble Ahead
![I Can See Trouble Ahead I Can See Trouble Ahead](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/4/1/2017-103682-83342_14131_4565_t.jpg?m=1498152832)
The images are based on studies of cognitive and visual perception in that they exploit limitations of visual perception and become a metaphor for social dynamics. If presented with two or more competing realities, our brains visual perception reacts in two ways. As in the Necker Cube Illusion, the brain will switch between possible realities, or will synthesise the realities into a plausible unreality. Cognitively, if we accept the premise that it is impossible to neither prove nor disprove the existence of God and we are solely reliant on evidence to draw conclusions, it is possible to say as an ideal, that there is no possibility of proof and that at best proof consists only as an internal consistency which when applied will result in a higher level of predictability. As we have seen with the development of politics in recent times, when politicians put their self interest before the welfare of the country, the competing realities in an adversarial democratic system, the resultant public policy takes on a Kafkaesque absurdity.
![Paranoia Paranoia](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/0/4/2017-103682-83343_30472_41265_t.jpg?m=1498152886)
Paranoia
![Paranoia Paranoia](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/0/4/2017-103682-83343_30472_4565_t.jpg?m=1498152886)
The images are based on studies of cognitive and visual perception in that they exploit limitations of visual perception and become a metaphor for social dynamics. If presented with two or more competing realities, our brains visual perception reacts in two ways. As in the Necker Cube Illusion, the brain will switch between possible realities, or will synthesise the realities into a plausible unreality. Cognitively, if we accept the premise that it is impossible to neither prove nor disprove the existence of God and we are solely reliant on evidence to draw conclusions, it is possible to say as an ideal, that there is no possibility of proof and that at best proof consists only as an internal consistency which when applied will result in a higher level of predictability. As we have seen with the development of politics in recent times, when politicians put their self interest before the welfare of the country, the competing realities in an adversarial democratic system, the resultant public policy takes on a Kafkaesque absurdity.
![Schizophrenia Schizophrenia](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/3/1/2017-103682-83344_23142_41265_t.jpg?m=1498152948)
Schizophrenia
![Schizophrenia Schizophrenia](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/3/1/2017-103682-83344_23142_4565_t.jpg?m=1498152948)
The images are based on studies of cognitive and visual perception in that they exploit limitations of visual perception and become a metaphor for social dynamics. If presented with two or more competing realities, our brains visual perception reacts in two ways. As in the Necker Cube Illusion, the brain will switch between possible realities, or will synthesise the realities into a plausible unreality. Cognitively, if we accept the premise that it is impossible to neither prove nor disprove the existence of God and we are solely reliant on evidence to draw conclusions, it is possible to say as an ideal, that there is no possibility of proof and that at best proof consists only as an internal consistency which when applied will result in a higher level of predictability. As we have seen with the development of politics in recent times, when politicians put their self interest before the welfare of the country, the competing realities in an adversarial democratic system, the resultant public policy takes on a Kafkaesque absurdity.
![Teo Tales of a City Teo Tales of a City](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/5/3/2017-103682-83345_8538_41265_t.jpg?m=1498153019)
Teo Tales of a City
![Teo Tales of a City Teo Tales of a City](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/5/3/2017-103682-83345_8538_4565_t.jpg?m=1498153019)
The images are based on studies of cognitive and visual perception in that they exploit limitations of visual perception and become a metaphor for social dynamics. If presented with two or more competing realities, our brains visual perception reacts in two ways. As in the Necker Cube Illusion, the brain will switch between possible realities, or will synthesise the realities into a plausible unreality. Cognitively, if we accept the premise that it is impossible to neither prove nor disprove the existence of God and we are solely reliant on evidence to draw conclusions, it is possible to say as an ideal, that there is no possibility of proof and that at best proof consists only as an internal consistency which when applied will result in a higher level of predictability. As we have seen with the development of politics in recent times, when politicians put their self interest before the welfare of the country, the competing realities in an adversarial democratic system, the resultant public policy takes on a Kafkaesque absurdity.
![Uber and the Erosion of Western Civilisation Uber and the Erosion of Western Civilisation](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/0/3/2017-103682-83346_20348_41265_t.jpg?m=1498153081)
Uber and the Erosion of Western Civilisation
![Uber and the Erosion of Western Civilisation Uber and the Erosion of Western Civilisation](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/0/3/2017-103682-83346_20348_4565_t.jpg?m=1498153081)
The images are based on studies of cognitive and visual perception in that they exploit limitations of visual perception and become a metaphor for social dynamics. If presented with two or more competing realities, our brains visual perception reacts in two ways. As in the Necker Cube Illusion, the brain will switch between possible realities, or will synthesise the realities into a plausible unreality. Cognitively, if we accept the premise that it is impossible to neither prove nor disprove the existence of God and we are solely reliant on evidence to draw conclusions, it is possible to say as an ideal, that there is no possibility of proof and that at best proof consists only as an internal consistency which when applied will result in a higher level of predictability. As we have seen with the development of politics in recent times, when politicians put their self interest before the welfare of the country, the competing realities in an adversarial democratic system, the resultant public policy takes on a Kafkaesque absurdity.
![Wormholes Wormholes](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/8/0/2017-103682-83347_28067_41265_t.jpg?m=1498153114)
Wormholes
![Wormholes Wormholes](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/8/0/2017-103682-83347_28067_4565_t.jpg?m=1498153114)
The images are based on studies of cognitive and visual perception in that they exploit limitations of visual perception and become a metaphor for social dynamics. If presented with two or more competing realities, our brains visual perception reacts in two ways. As in the Necker Cube Illusion, the brain will switch between possible realities, or will synthesise the realities into a plausible unreality. Cognitively, if we accept the premise that it is impossible to neither prove nor disprove the existence of God and we are solely reliant on evidence to draw conclusions, it is possible to say as an ideal, that there is no possibility of proof and that at best proof consists only as an internal consistency which when applied will result in a higher level of predictability. As we have seen with the development of politics in recent times, when politicians put their self interest before the welfare of the country, the competing realities in an adversarial democratic system, the resultant public policy takes on a Kafkaesque absurdity.
![WYSIWYG WYSIWYG](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/7/6/2017-103682-83348_376_41265_t.jpg?m=1498153154)
WYSIWYG
![WYSIWYG WYSIWYG](https://www.celesteprize.com/indi/_pics/7/6/2017-103682-83348_376_4565_t.jpg?m=1498153154)
The images are based on studies of cognitive and visual perception in that they exploit limitations of visual perception and become a metaphor for social dynamics. If presented with two or more competing realities, our brains visual perception reacts in two ways. As in the Necker Cube Illusion, the brain will switch between possible realities, or will synthesise the realities into a plausible unreality. Cognitively, if we accept the premise that it is impossible to neither prove nor disprove the existence of God and we are solely reliant on evidence to draw conclusions, it is possible to say as an ideal, that there is no possibility of proof and that at best proof consists only as an internal consistency which when applied will result in a higher level of predictability. As we have seen with the development of politics in recent times, when politicians put their self interest before the welfare of the country, the competing realities in an adversarial democratic system, the resultant public policy takes on a Kafkaesque absurdity.
Comments 0
Say something