12 August 2012
Interview with Luca Rossi
Mimmo:
I read your article about Flash Art, really embarrassing for you of course, play a round of internal dialectical mechanism that can only be aimed at materializing situations internal to that system of art, it is not true but a critical cropping space, I find it very brave ....
John Doe:
Internal? How can you talk about inside if you do not have a definition of "box". I think you see only what you have in your eyes and lack of many things.
Mimmo:
The definition of the box .. and you know its structure and derive from the outside, smontandola, reassembling it, to understand how a box for shoes you should not reduce you to be as small as a bug to get into it you can not find? Of course I see what my knowledge of the facts shows me and I think all in all I is not depriving you of many things or think of as insider passartela much better than me?
I also have a story for you called Fabio Cavallucci ....
A few years ago in 2005 a performance of Mario clone fish forest with an artist then sadly left the scene called Emmanuel Benedetti, after a few years you came along like that Benedetti has since established a research diplomatically packaged and offered it as if antiimpacchettabile Seahorses do not think this is really a serious professional mistake in your opinion?
Luca Rossi
Mha, it seems to me that you feel cheated by my work as a blogger. While we are different and compatible: anyone can do whatever he wants regardless of being inside or outside a system. The point is DO WHAT it is doing. Or better yet HOW: There are many ways to play between reality and fiction.
Mimmo:
On this I agree, you are confused about one thing: The goal. I think of another art system articulated in the network do without all the unnecessary surplus market, what did you think? So just to be clear about our co-existence?
P. S. About Seahorses do not have anything to say?
John Doe:
for now the market does not interest me, but I try not fasciarmi the head before falling. I've always written that before designing a new opera is better to see different ones they have already.
Mimmo:
As usual evade eludi clippings and you your space and ego-ecological niche, in fact your figure does not move and does not move anything and is an unnecessary frill that you created to strategically set up a dialectic that does not exist, otherwise our experiences would not be so different, you say you do not design new posters in the works but I do like artistic drawings movimentiste and daughters of a blog and a collective identity, think seriously bite somebody? For me you are already fallen, not as the new scenarios and possibilities, but follow and carry the wind and the events, you are denying the motion, I try to richiedertelo more directly what you think of Fabio Cavalucci as a cameraman and art-cloner ?
That there are already .. just to adjust their strategic positions and system, I dated the use of blogs and somehow top-down (I think of media phenomena such as political or Grillo Labor and dictate how the political agenda), culture and artistic research they tend to spread and to control rather than to the blog are turning to social networks that allow them to network structure in a horizontal, short workshops are compared with the blogs that are conservative in some way in the form transmitter and receiver, as blogger filters and control your information evading reactions and side effects, you may not be a liberal fascist Berlusconi's wake?
John Doe:
All your chat, I tend only to the contents within the contemporary art system. I consider a workshop interesting and not a political party to change the world. Never thought about collective identities or blog as a tool in itself innovative. We need to see HOW things are used.
What do you think of Seahorses? I think good. But I did not feel like I get a report on the person. We're not at the reception parents.
Mimmo:
The problem is that the contents of which are unique to a unique contemporary art (and what it means to know just you) automatically become unattractive and not ethical, communication criticism for the consumption of the same system is something of autistic art has little, talk often to see how things are used but never as the encoding you use, your eyes do not fly over appearance and never easy on your blog is aimed at critical operations that attaversano galleries, exhibitions and art spaces; Do you Seahorse good? Are you fearing to do a report on his person? We are not in receipt of the parents, but you show up as a blogger is not it?
I have one other question for you dear friend Luca Rossi, Documenta 7 and without the action of seven thousand oaks, 1982 What would be the market of Beuys? So the market first, then Cassel and we talk about the history of the Land Art of Documenta 12 and Ai Weiwei? Without it we would know who is either Ai Weiwei, but we outraged by his imprisonment under the 1001 Chinese who had never left the People's Republic, its fame has spread like wildfire even stronger installation of the Turbine Hall Tate's shot from seventy in 2006 to first place in 2011 in the ranking of ArtReview, for which reason, if you know that we are talking about the market because you insist on parroting an attitude of critical cultural and artistic in that context has no meaning ?
John Doe:
Look, you who have eyes only the market, and are attached with this market. When all I use comes from the market. So I suggest you get out of this because what seems LOOP Berlusconi seems to you, even George Mastrota.
Mimmo:
I seemed to have understood ... that the intent of your work there was a desire to escape the filth of approval, to do this but it seems you're looking for with tenacity the production, distribution and consent of the same taste of the market, Mastrota perhaps ignore it worked in old trash films of D'Angelo and D'Alessio, you seem to be hit by a limited view that condemns you to spread cinepanettone, offending art as De Sica's memory of his father.
John Doe:
You talk in slogans. Depends if the approval is right or wrong. It is argued the contents. Do not proceed in slogans. I do not I escape escape from time to propose a system but a way of doing things in a laboratory that has certain rules.
Mimmo:
Spouses ... in other words the economic logic of the dominant system, criticism aimed at the distribution passive self, anything active in your work, celebrate the futile and useless, cinepanettoni you like?
John Doe:
yes, but they are also free to do what I want and I want to report. All this freedom leftist and then force me to talk about something that you decide? But by ...
Of course I turn to the art system and beyond. As the fiat is directed to the car or the baker who wants the system to the bread ... but speeches do?? Bada to content. It 'clear that if you have a distorted and anachronistic conception of art there will never understand anything. As an engineer who studied the books of the late nineteenth century and claims to work at Ferrari today.
Mimmo:
Anachronism?
No anachronism, my reasoning and not yours is the natural result of a heteronomous system, subject to the liberal socialist fascist communist and a little in appearance of financial markets, the invisible hand of economic and private technoscientific representation and digital-virtual the modern world threatens to extinguish the artistic identity of the human with your complicity, we are both generated from this, our creative nature is still deformed and damaged, but we can still represent it and we can represent another system of art as a Travel at this time.
To do this, no indifference, carelessness or superficiality, these things preserve the ruling system, we must not think of the economic model imposed to recover and preserve an ego-logical approach to art.
The art can no longer ignore and evade the political debate, otherwise it delivers a unique history of the planet who does not speak for r-existing artistic and creative, but only elected, but what the fuck you'll ever hear any of this? Your analysis is the last stop of the book Vettese and aspire to become a mechanic at Ferrari?
You know why I consider you less of a nonentity, and art criticism? Because in your analysis you are unable to relate the facts of art and the artist for its artefacts, all of your analysis and your thoughts are the daughters of images with no content ...
Luke:
In my opinion you should start thinking that anything you think is wrong. Try it
Mimmo:
In my opinion you should cominiciare to think that whatever you think is not right, we try?
Luke:
Yes, but they are also free to do what I want and I want to report. All this freedom leftist and then force me to talk about something that you decide? But by ...
Of course I turn to the art system and beyond. As the fiat is directed to the car or the baker who wants the system to the bread ... but speeches do?? Bada to content. It 'clear that if you have a distorted and anachronistic conception of art there will never understand anything. As an engineer who studied the books of the late nineteenth century and claims to work at Ferrari today.
I think you shelters in the art just because you believe that art has no rules and no one can say that you're all wrong. Every act is political (even making bread). Art is a laboratory where as another move. Like any other discipline. Attracts mediocre just because there is a presumption that everything will be fine. It is not so.
Mimmo:
I can agree if we're talking about art, but this time the judges and not the same and although I may be just a mediocre one Diprè whatever to show that even the proletarian mediocrity in this sick time claims its visibility, I do not pay at least three hundred euros Diprè, I wonder, however, people like you who have parameter in assessing the quality of the rule before the contemporary, other than that selected by the market economy means, otherwise we are not thinking about art and you you would be unable to say that I'm doing it all wrong ...
Mimmo:
I read your article about Flash Art, really embarrassing for you of course, play a round of internal dialectical mechanism that can only be aimed at materializing situations internal to that system of art, it is not true but a critical cropping space, I find it very brave ....
John Doe:
Internal? How can you talk about inside if you do not have a definition of "box". I think you see only what you have in your eyes and lack of many things.
Mimmo:
The definition of the box .. and you know its structure and derive from the outside, smontandola, reassembling it, to understand how a box for shoes you should not reduce you to be as small as a bug to get into it you can not find? Of course I see what my knowledge of the facts shows me and I think all in all I is not depriving you of many things or think of as insider passartela much better than me?
I also have a story for you called Fabio Cavallucci ....
A few years ago in 2005 a performance of Mario clone fish forest with an artist then sadly left the scene called Emmanuel Benedetti, after a few years you came along like that Benedetti has since established a research diplomatically packaged and offered it as if antiimpacchettabile Seahorses do not think this is really a serious professional mistake in your opinion?
Luca Rossi
Mha, it seems to me that you feel cheated by my work as a blogger. While we are different and compatible: anyone can do whatever he wants regardless of being inside or outside a system. The point is DO WHAT it is doing. Or better yet HOW: There are many ways to play between reality and fiction.
Mimmo:
On this I agree, you are confused about one thing: The goal. I think of another art system articulated in the network do without all the unnecessary surplus market, what did you think? So just to be clear about our co-existence?
P. S. About Seahorses do not have anything to say?
John Doe:
for now the market does not interest me, but I try not fasciarmi the head before falling. I've always written that before designing a new opera is better to see different ones they have already.
Mimmo:
As usual evade eludi clippings and you your space and ego-ecological niche, in fact your figure does not move and does not move anything and is an unnecessary frill that you created to strategically set up a dialectic that does not exist, otherwise our experiences would not be so different, you say you do not design new posters in the works but I do like artistic drawings movimentiste and daughters of a blog and a collective identity, think seriously bite somebody? For me you are already fallen, not as the new scenarios and possibilities, but follow and carry the wind and the events, you are denying the motion, I try to richiedertelo more directly what you think of Fabio Cavalucci as a cameraman and art-cloner ?
That there are already .. just to adjust their strategic positions and system, I dated the use of blogs and somehow top-down (I think of media phenomena such as political or Grillo Labor and dictate how the political agenda), culture and artistic research they tend to spread and to control rather than to the blog are turning to social networks that allow them to network structure in a horizontal, short workshops are compared with the blogs that are conservative in some way in the form transmitter and receiver, as blogger filters and control your information evading reactions and side effects, you may not be a liberal fascist Berlusconi's wake?
John Doe:
All your chat, I tend only to the contents within the contemporary art system. I consider a workshop interesting and not a political party to change the world. Never thought about collective identities or blog as a tool in itself innovative. We need to see HOW things are used.
What do you think of Seahorses? I think good. But I did not feel like I get a report on the person. We're not at the reception parents.
Mimmo:
The problem is that the contents of which are unique to a unique contemporary art (and what it means to know just you) automatically become unattractive and not ethical, communication criticism for the consumption of the same system is something of autistic art has little, talk often to see how things are used but never as the encoding you use, your eyes do not fly over appearance and never easy on your blog is aimed at critical operations that attaversano galleries, exhibitions and art spaces; Do you Seahorse good? Are you fearing to do a report on his person? We are not in receipt of the parents, but you show up as a blogger is not it?
I have one other question for you dear friend Luca Rossi, Documenta 7 and without the action of seven thousand oaks, 1982 What would be the market of Beuys? So the market first, then Cassel and we talk about the history of the Land Art of Documenta 12 and Ai Weiwei? Without it we would know who is either Ai Weiwei, but we outraged by his imprisonment under the 1001 Chinese who had never left the People's Republic, its fame has spread like wildfire even stronger installation of the Turbine Hall Tate's shot from seventy in 2006 to first place in 2011 in the ranking of ArtReview, for which reason, if you know that we are talking about the market because you insist on parroting an attitude of critical cultural and artistic in that context has no meaning ?
John Doe:
Look, you who have eyes only the market, and are attached with this market. When all I use comes from the market. So I suggest you get out of this because what seems LOOP Berlusconi seems to you, even George Mastrota.
Mimmo:
I seemed to have understood ... that the intent of your work there was a desire to escape the filth of approval, to do this but it seems you're looking for with tenacity the production, distribution and consent of the same taste of the market, Mastrota perhaps ignore it worked in old trash films of D'Angelo and D'Alessio, you seem to be hit by a limited view that condemns you to spread cinepanettone, offending art as De Sica's memory of his father.
John Doe:
You talk in slogans. Depends if the approval is right or wrong. It is argued the contents. Do not proceed in slogans. I do not I escape escape from time to propose a system but a way of doing things in a laboratory that has certain rules.
Mimmo:
Spouses ... in other words the economic logic of the dominant system, criticism aimed at the distribution passive self, anything active in your work, celebrate the futile and useless, cinepanettoni you like?
John Doe:
yes, but they are also free to do what I want and I want to report. All this freedom leftist and then force me to talk about something that you decide? But by ...
Of course I turn to the art system and beyond. As the fiat is directed to the car or the baker who wants the system to the bread ... but speeches do?? Bada to content. It 'clear that if you have a distorted and anachronistic conception of art there will never understand anything. As an engineer who studied the books of the late nineteenth century and claims to work at Ferrari today.
Mimmo:
Anachronism?
No anachronism, my reasoning and not yours is the natural result of a heteronomous system, subject to the liberal socialist fascist communist and a little in appearance of financial markets, the invisible hand of economic and private technoscientific representation and digital-virtual the modern world threatens to extinguish the artistic identity of the human with your complicity, we are both generated from this, our creative nature is still deformed and damaged, but we can still represent it and we can represent another system of art as a Travel at this time.
To do this, no indifference, carelessness or superficiality, these things preserve the ruling system, we must not think of the economic model imposed to recover and preserve an ego-logical approach to art.
The art can no longer ignore and evade the political debate, otherwise it delivers a unique history of the planet who does not speak for r-existing artistic and creative, but only elected, but what the fuck you'll ever hear any of this? Your analysis is the last stop of the book Vettese and aspire to become a mechanic at Ferrari?
You know why I consider you less of a nonentity, and art criticism? Because in your analysis you are unable to relate the facts of art and the artist for its artefacts, all of your analysis and your thoughts are the daughters of images with no content ...
Luke:
In my opinion you should start thinking that anything you think is wrong. Try it
Mimmo:
In my opinion you should cominiciare to think that whatever you think is not right, we try?
Luke:
Yes, but they are also free to do what I want and I want to report. All this freedom leftist and then force me to talk about something that you decide? But by ...
Of course I turn to the art system and beyond. As the fiat is directed to the car or the baker who wants the system to the bread ... but speeches do?? Bada to content. It 'clear that if you have a distorted and anachronistic conception of art there will never understand anything. As an engineer who studied the books of the late nineteenth century and claims to work at Ferrari today.
I think you shelters in the art just because you believe that art has no rules and no one can say that you're all wrong. Every act is political (even making bread). Art is a laboratory where as another move. Like any other discipline. Attracts mediocre just because there is a presumption that everything will be fine. It is not so.
Mimmo:
I can agree if we're talking about art, but this time the judges and not the same and although I may be just a mediocre one Diprè whatever to show that even the proletarian mediocrity in this sick time claims its visibility, I do not pay at least three hundred euros Diprè, I wonder, however, people like you who have parameter in assessing the quality of the rule before the contemporary, other than that selected by the market economy means, otherwise we are not thinking about art and you you would be unable to say that I'm doing it all wrong ...
Comments 0
Say something